Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: KSR[T]: "KSR[T] Advisory #3: updatedb / crontabs"
• Previous message: Phillip R. Jaenke: "Flaw in DNS"
• In reply to: Casper Dik: "Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets"
• Next in thread: Eivind Eklund: "Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets"

On Mon, Oct 06, 1997 at 10:34:03AM +0200, Casper Dik wrote:
>
> I think that the xnet sockets did get changed to honor the permissions.

I can confirm this.  I have the x/Open book documenting the behavior of
Xnet sockets.  And it has changed to honor the permissions.

>
> Casper
>

--
Edsel Adap                            (905) 669-8375
adap@interlog.com                     adap@andrews.edu
adap@torfree.net                      edsel@canada.sun.com
http://www.interlog.com/~adap/        LINUX - the choice of the GNU generation!

The negation of a disjunction is logically equivalent to the conjunction
of the negations and the negation of a conjunction is logically
equivalent to the disjunction of the negations. -- DeMorgan

DISCLAIMER:  The ideas expressed in this message is neither mine or my
             employer's responsibility!

• Next message: KSR[T]: "KSR[T] Advisory #3: updatedb / crontabs"
• Previous message: Phillip R. Jaenke: "Flaw in DNS"
• In reply to: Casper Dik: "Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets"
• Next in thread: Eivind Eklund: "Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets"